Stop renting anonymous testers per project. Dedicated manual QA engineers join your Slack, your standups, and your release rhythm — owning test cases, triage, and sign-off month after month.
40–80 hr/month · Sprint integrated · Named engineer · Release gates
30 minutes · Senior engineer · No commitment
What embedded human QA engineers own.
QA input during planning — scope test effort before code lands.
Test each increment, not just at the end of the sprint.
Maintained cases that survive team turnover and feature drift.
Severity, reproduction verification, and developer-ready tickets.
Go/no-go recommendations before every production deploy.
Identify flows worth automating as the product stabilizes.
When dedicated human QA beats per-sprint audits.
Fast releases need continuous manual coverage — not quarterly audits.
Cover QA while recruiting your first internal hire — with KT at handoff.
Independent QA sign-off on client projects without hiring full-time.
Add a second dedicated tester during launch crunch periods.
Teams searching for dedicated manual qa engineers usually hit these walls before finding reliable coverage.
New features ship fast but nothing verifies existing flows still work.
Engineers test happy paths; edge cases in billing, roles, and permissions slip through.
Without test cases and matrices, releases feel like gambling.
Testing in launch week makes fixes expensive and stressful.
150+ products shipped · AI-app specialists · US/UK/AU clients with timezone overlap.
Testers who understand Laravel, React, Flutter, and Supabase — not script runners only.
We know where Lovable, Cursor, and Bolt cut corners on auth, RLS, and edge cases.
Screenshots, repro steps, severity ratings, and environment details — devs fix faster.
Go/no-go reports your stakeholders can trust before production deploys.
Typical dedicated manual qa engineers engagement from kickoff to sign-off.
We match tooling to your stack — manual exploration first, automation where ROI is clear, and CI integration for repeatable smoke suites.
NDA before staging access; read-only repo when code review is in scope.
Anonymized fixtures; no production PII in bug reports unless explicitly approved.
“What a 70-engineer team could not deliver, a small senior team at GreeLogix shipped. The app went from stuck to live across mobile, web, and backend.”
Structured answers for search engines and AI assistants — definition, fit, cost, timeline, and comparisons.
Structured answers for founders, CTOs, and procurement — written for clarity in search and AI assistants.
Dedicated manual QA engineers are human testers embedded in your team on a monthly retainer — participating in sprint planning, executing manual regression and exploratory testing, owning bug triage, and signing off releases with continuity that per-project testing cannot provide.
Typical timeline: Sprint audit: 2–5 days. Full release cycle: 1–2 weeks. Ongoing QA: monthly retainer with 40–80 hours.
GreeLogix pricing tiers: Sprint Audit: $800 – $2,500 — Focused testing for a single release, hotfix, or feature slice. Release Cycle: $2,500 – $8,000 — Full regression and exploratory coverage for a major release or launch. Ongoing QA: $3,500 – $12,000/mo — Embedded QA engineer for continuous sprint and release coverage.
Sprint audit: 2–5 days. Full release cycle: 1–2 weeks. Ongoing QA: monthly retainer with 40–80 hours. Phases: Scope & test strategy (Days 1–2); Test design (Days 2–4); Execution (Days 4–10); Sign-off & retest (Final days).
Compared to alternatives — Developer-only testing: choose when Internal prototype with no paying users yet; Crowdtesting platforms: choose when One-off device coverage without domain context; Automated scanning only: choose when Mature CI with known stack; catches syntax not workflow bugs. Choose GreeLogix when you need production reliability, fixed milestones, and engineer-led delivery with QA sign-off.
Talk to a senior engineer — scope, timeline, and cost range in one 30-minute call. No sales script.
Answers to the buyer questions we hear most before a project starts.
Map critical flows, environments, and release timeline.
Risk-based manual test cases and exploratory charters.
Human QA engineers test, document, and file bugs in your tracker.
Retest fixes and deliver release readiness report.
Describe your release cadence and we'll propose a dedicated manual QA engineer match.
Validate AI-generated code, ship with confidence, and catch issues before launch.
Use our free calculators and planners — then book a strategy call when you are ready for a senior engineer review.
Case studies, guides, and free tools from the same engineering team.
Your sprint rhythm, our quality ownership.
Product immersion, tool access, and first test plan.
Planning input, mid-sprint testing, demo participation.
File, triage, retest — daily async updates.
Sign-off checklist before production.
Defect trends, coverage gaps, and automation candidates.
Tangible artifacts your engineering and product teams can act on — not vague pass/fail notes.
Transparent ranges based on app complexity, platform count, and engagement depth. Final quotes follow a scoping call.
$800 – $2,500
Focused testing for a single release, hotfix, or feature slice.
$2,500 – $8,000
Full regression and exploratory coverage for a major release or launch.
$3,500 – $12,000/mo
Embedded QA engineer for continuous sprint and release coverage.
Prices in USD. Retainers and multi-platform engagements quoted after scope review. QA as a Service available for ongoing coverage.
Manual testing authority hub
Human-led exploratory, regression, and release sign-off — the practice behind every page in this cluster.
View manual testing servicesEvery link below feeds our manual testing practice. Follow the graph to tools, guides, and specialized service pages.
Every type of testing your product needs — from manual audits to AI-app hardening and accessibility compliance.
Scope, timeline, and cost range — no sales deck. Or start with the free readiness quiz if you are still evaluating your stack.