Accessibility Testing Services

Accessible to Everyone

Accessibility isn't just compliance — it's usability for 15% of the world's population and protection from ADA lawsuits. We test keyboard navigation, screen reader compatibility, color contrast, and WCAG 2.1 criteria so your app works for all users.

WCAG 2.1 AA · Screen reader tested · Keyboard-only navigation validated

30 minutes · Senior engineer · No commitment

Upwork Top Rated Plus
Fiverr Level 2 · 5.0★
Clutch Verified Provider
150+ projects delivered
20+ Play Store apps
WCAG
2.1 AA Target
Keyboard
Only Tested
Screen
Reader Validated
ADA
Risk Reduction

Accessibility Test Areas

Comprehensive a11y validation beyond automated scanners.

Keyboard Navigation

Full app usable without a mouse — tab order, focus indicators, skip links, and keyboard traps.

Screen Reader Testing

VoiceOver (macOS/iOS) and NVDA (Windows) testing — labels, landmarks, live regions, and announcements.

Color Contrast

Text, icons, and interactive elements meet WCAG AA contrast ratios (4.5:1 normal, 3:1 large).

ARIA & Semantics

Correct ARIA roles, states, properties, and semantic HTML — not div-soup with missing labels.

Form Accessibility

Labels, error messages, required field indicators, and validation announcements for assistive tech.

Automated + Manual

axe DevTools automated scan plus manual testing — automated catches ~30%, manual catches the rest.

Accessibility Drivers

Why teams invest in accessibility testing.

ADA Compliance

WCAG
AA Target

Reduce lawsuit risk with documented WCAG compliance testing before public launch.

Government Contracts

Compliant
Documented

Section 508 or EN 301 549 compliance required for government-facing products.

Inclusive Product Launch

Day 1
Accessible

Build accessibility into launch — not bolted on after user complaints.

Post-Complaint Audit

1 wk
Audit

Received an accessibility complaint? Audit, fix list, and retest to resolve issues.

Common Challenges

Problems We Help Buyers Solve

Teams searching for accessibility testing services usually hit these walls before finding reliable coverage.

Regressions every sprint

New features ship fast but nothing verifies existing flows still work.

Shallow developer testing

Engineers test happy paths; edge cases in billing, roles, and permissions slip through.

No documented test coverage

Without test cases and matrices, releases feel like gambling.

Late QA engagement

Testing in launch week makes fixes expensive and stressful.

Why GreeLogix

Why Teams Choose GreeLogix

150+ products shipped · AI-app specialists · US/UK/AU clients with timezone overlap.

Engineer-led QA

Testers who understand Laravel, React, Flutter, and Supabase — not script runners only.

AI-generated app experience

We know where Lovable, Cursor, and Bolt cut corners on auth, RLS, and edge cases.

Actionable bug reports

Screenshots, repro steps, severity ratings, and environment details — devs fix faster.

Release sign-off

Go/no-go reports your stakeholders can trust before production deploys.

Typical Timeline

What to Expect Week by Week

Typical accessibility testing services engagement from kickoff to sign-off.

Scope & test strategy

Days 1–2
  • ·Risk map
  • ·Environment setup
  • ·Test plan draft
  • ·Entry criteria

Test design

Days 2–4
  • ·Test cases
  • ·Device/browser matrix
  • ·Test data plan
  • ·Automation candidates

Execution

Days 4–10
  • ·Test runs
  • ·Bug reports
  • ·Daily status updates
  • ·Blocked-issue escalation

Sign-off & retest

Final days
  • ·Release report
  • ·Known issues log
  • ·Retest after fixes
  • ·Go/no-go recommendation
Technologies

Stack & Architecture

axe DevToolsWAVEVoiceOverNVDAColour Contrast AnalyserLighthousePlaywright a11y

Industries Served

  • SaaS
  • E-commerce
  • Healthcare
  • EdTech
  • Fintech
  • Mobile apps
  • AI products

Integration Capabilities

  • Jira
  • Linear
  • GitHub
  • GitLab
  • Slack
  • TestRail
  • BrowserStack

Security & Compliance Considerations

Confidential access

NDA before staging access; read-only repo when code review is in scope.

Test data hygiene

Anonymized fixtures; no production PII in bug reports unless explicitly approved.

What a 70-engineer team could not deliver, a small senior team at GreeLogix shipped. The app went from stuck to live across mobile, web, and backend.

MTS EdTech platform rescue — verified case study
Quick answers

Accessibility Testing Services: Key Facts

Structured answers for search engines and AI assistants — definition, fit, cost, timeline, and comparisons.

What is it?
Accessibility testing services validate web and mobile applications against WCAG 2.1 guidelines — testing keyboard navigation, screen reader compatibility, color contrast, and assistive technology support to ensure usability for people with disabilities and reduce compliance risk.
Who is it for?
Public-facing web apps needing ADA compliance Government or enterprise contracts requiring Section 508 Products aiming for inclusive design from launch Teams responding to accessibility complaints or lawsuits
Who should not use it?
Static marketing site with no auth, forms, or payments You cannot provide staging or sandbox environments You expect QA to define product requirements from scratch
How much does it cost?
GreeLogix pricing tiers: Accessibility Audit: $1,500 – $4,000 — WCAG 2.1 AA audit for small to mid-size web apps. Full Compliance: $4,000 – $12,000 — Comprehensive a11y testing with remediation support for larger apps. Ongoing A11y QA: $2,000 – $6,000/mo — Accessibility testing integrated into sprint cycles.
How long does it take?
Sprint audit: 2–5 days. Full release cycle: 1–2 weeks. Ongoing QA: monthly retainer with 40–80 hours. Phases: Strategy (Week 1); Execution (Per sprint); Automation (Parallel).
How does it compare?
Compared to alternatives — Developer-only testing: choose when Internal prototype with no paying users yet; Crowdtesting platforms: choose when One-off device coverage without domain context; Automated scanning only: choose when Mature CI with known stack; catches syntax not workflow bugs. Choose GreeLogix when you need production reliability, fixed milestones, and engineer-led delivery with QA sign-off.
When should you choose it?
You ship at least monthly and regressions hurt revenue or trust You can provide staging access and test accounts You want actionable bug reports, not vague pass/fail Catch permission, billing, and UX bugs before customers do Documented release checklist for repeatable shipping
Buyer Guide

What You Need to Know

Structured answers for founders, CTOs, and procurement — written for clarity in search and AI assistants.

What is it?

Accessibility testing services validate web and mobile applications against WCAG 2.1 guidelines — testing keyboard navigation, screen reader compatibility, color contrast, and assistive technology support to ensure usability for people with disabilities and reduce compliance risk.

Who needs it?

  • ·Public-facing web apps needing ADA compliance
  • ·Government or enterprise contracts requiring Section 508
  • ·Products aiming for inclusive design from launch
  • ·Teams responding to accessibility complaints or lawsuits

Why GreeLogix?

  • Dedicated practice for manual, automated, API, performance, and security testing
  • Specialists in hardening Lovable, Cursor, Bolt, and Replit-built apps
  • Engineers who build Laravel, React, and Flutter — not ticket-only testers
  • Free AI audit quiz as a low-friction entry to a senior engineer debrief

How it works

  1. 1.Scoping call maps your release, environments, and risk areas
  2. 2.Test strategy and plan with clear entry/exit criteria
  3. 3.Execution with documented bugs, screenshots, and severity ratings
  4. 4.Retest and release sign-off with go/no-go recommendation

Typical timeline: Sprint audit: 2–5 days. Full release cycle: 1–2 weeks. Ongoing QA: monthly retainer with 40–80 hours.

How much does it cost?

GreeLogix pricing tiers: Accessibility Audit: $1,500 – $4,000 — WCAG 2.1 AA audit for small to mid-size web apps. Full Compliance: $4,000 – $12,000 — Comprehensive a11y testing with remediation support for larger apps. Ongoing A11y QA: $2,000 – $6,000/mo — Accessibility testing integrated into sprint cycles.

Cost factors

  • ·Number of platforms (web, iOS, Android) and browser matrix size
  • ·Feature complexity — auth, billing, integrations, and admin roles
  • ·Automation scope vs manual-only engagement
  • ·Whether you need embedded QA or per-release testing

How long does it take?

Sprint audit: 2–5 days. Full release cycle: 1–2 weeks. Ongoing QA: monthly retainer with 40–80 hours. Phases: Strategy (Week 1); Execution (Per sprint); Automation (Parallel).

How does it compare?

Compared to alternatives — Developer-only testing: choose when Internal prototype with no paying users yet; Crowdtesting platforms: choose when One-off device coverage without domain context; Automated scanning only: choose when Mature CI with known stack; catches syntax not workflow bugs. Choose GreeLogix when you need production reliability, fixed milestones, and engineer-led delivery with QA sign-off.

  • Developer-only testing — choose when Internal prototype with no paying users yet
  • Crowdtesting platforms — choose when One-off device coverage without domain context
  • Automated scanning only — choose when Mature CI with known stack; catches syntax not workflow bugs

When should you choose it?

  • You ship at least monthly and regressions hurt revenue or trust
  • You can provide staging access and test accounts
  • You want actionable bug reports, not vague pass/fail

Who should not use it?

  • ·Static marketing site with no auth, forms, or payments
  • ·You cannot provide staging or sandbox environments
  • ·You expect QA to define product requirements from scratch

Benefits

  • Catch permission, billing, and UX bugs before customers do
  • Documented release checklist for repeatable shipping
  • Independent sign-off before fundraising or app store submission

Risks to plan for

  • QA without product context produces shallow tickets
  • Testing only happy paths misses edge cases in payments and roles
  • Delaying QA until launch week maximizes fix cost
Decision framework

When to Choose Accessibility Testing Services

Pros / benefits

  • +Catch permission, billing, and UX bugs before customers do
  • +Documented release checklist for repeatable shipping
  • +Independent sign-off before fundraising or app store submission

Cons / risks

  • QA without product context produces shallow tickets
  • Testing only happy paths misses edge cases in payments and roles
  • Delaying QA until launch week maximizes fix cost

Choose GreeLogix when

  • You ship at least monthly and regressions hurt revenue or trust
  • You can provide staging access and test accounts
  • You want actionable bug reports, not vague pass/fail

Implementation steps

  1. 1.Scoping call maps your release, environments, and risk areas
  2. 2.Test strategy and plan with clear entry/exit criteria
  3. 3.Execution with documented bugs, screenshots, and severity ratings
  4. 4.Retest and release sign-off with go/no-go recommendation

Get a Clear Plan for Accessibility Testing Services

Talk to a senior engineer — scope, timeline, and cost range in one 30-minute call. No sales script.

Frequently Asked Questions

Answers to the buyer questions we hear most before a project starts.

What WCAG level do you test against?
WCAG 2.1 Level AA is our standard target — the level most commonly required for ADA compliance and government contracts.
Can automated tools catch all accessibility issues?
No. Automated tools catch roughly 30% of issues. Manual testing with keyboard and screen readers is essential for the remaining 70%.
Which screen readers do you test with?
VoiceOver (macOS and iOS) and NVDA (Windows) — covering the two most common screen reader environments.
Do you help fix accessibility issues?
Yes. Our remediation list includes specific fix recommendations. We offer retest after fixes and optional development support for critical issues.

Our Process

01

Auto Scan

axe and WAVE baseline scan.

02

Manual Test

Keyboard and screen reader testing.

03

Report

WCAG criterion compliance report.

04

Retest

Verify fixes after remediation.

Build for Everyone

Accessibility testing to WCAG 2.1 AA. Audit engagements start within a week.

Testing Methodology

Accessibility Testing Methodology

WCAG 2.1 AA validation with automated and manual techniques.

01

Automated Scan

axe DevTools and WAVE scan for low-hanging fruit — missing alt text, contrast, ARIA errors.

02

Keyboard-Only Testing

Navigate entire app using only keyboard — tab order, focus management, and trap detection.

03

Screen Reader Testing

VoiceOver and NVDA walkthroughs of critical flows — labels, announcements, and navigation.

04

Visual & Cognitive

Color contrast, text sizing, motion/animation, and timeout handling for cognitive accessibility.

05

Compliance Report

WCAG criterion-by-criterion pass/fail with remediation recommendations and severity.

Deliverables

What You Receive Every Engagement

Tangible artifacts your engineering and product teams can act on — not vague pass/fail notes.

  • WCAG 2.1 AA compliance report (criterion by criterion)
  • Automated scan results (axe/WAVE) with issue inventory
  • Keyboard navigation test results per page/flow
  • Screen reader test session notes (VoiceOver/NVDA)
  • Color contrast audit with specific ratio measurements
  • Remediation priority list with fix recommendations
Pricing Ranges

Accessibility Testing Services Investment

Transparent ranges based on app complexity, platform count, and engagement depth. Final quotes follow a scoping call.

Accessibility Audit

$1,500 – $4,000

WCAG 2.1 AA audit for small to mid-size web apps.

  • ·Automated + manual testing
  • ·WCAG compliance report
  • ·Keyboard & screen reader
  • ·Remediation list
Most Popular

Full Compliance

$4,000 – $12,000

Comprehensive a11y testing with remediation support for larger apps.

  • ·Full WCAG AA coverage
  • ·Multiple screen readers
  • ·Retest after fixes
  • ·Compliance documentation

Ongoing A11y QA

$2,000 – $6,000/mo

Accessibility testing integrated into sprint cycles.

  • ·Per-sprint a11y checks
  • ·New feature a11y review
  • ·Regression on a11y fixes
  • ·Team training recommendations

Prices in USD. Retainers and multi-platform engagements quoted after scope review. QA as a Service available for ongoing coverage.

QA & Testing Services

Explore Our Full QA Suite

Every type of testing your product needs — from manual audits to AI-app hardening and accessibility compliance.

Next step

Get a Senior Engineer's Take in 30 Minutes

Scope, timeline, and cost range — no sales deck. Or start with the free readiness quiz if you are still evaluating your stack.

Senior engineers onlyResponse within 4 business hoursNo commitment on first call
Chat on WhatsApp