What is it?
Software QA and technical audit services cover manual and automated testing, performance and security checks, and senior engineer code review — especially for AI-generated or inherited codebases before production launch.
Code Review & Technical Audit
Know Exactly What You're Shipping
Whether you built it with AI tools, inherited it from a previous team, or need to validate it before raising a round — our senior engineers review your codebase and tell you exactly what's solid, what's risky, and what needs fixing.
From $500 · 5-day delivery · Two senior reviewers · 60-min debrief included
30 minutes · Senior engineer · No commitment
Upwork Top Rated Plus
Fiverr Level 2 · 5.0★
Clutch Verified Provider
150+ projects delivered
20+ Play Store apps
$500
Starting Price
5 days
Delivery
60min
Debrief Call Included
Senior
Engineers Only
What We Review
Every dimension of your codebase — not just whether it runs.
Architecture & Structure
Is the codebase organized for maintainability and scale? We evaluate folder structure, separation of concerns, and architectural patterns.
Security Review
Authentication, authorization, input validation, data exposure, dependency vulnerabilities, and secrets management.
Performance Analysis
N+1 queries, missing indexes, inefficient algorithms, unnecessary re-renders, and bundle size issues.
Code Quality
Naming conventions, code duplication, complexity metrics, error handling patterns, and maintainability score.
Test Coverage
What's tested, what's not, and what the gaps mean for your risk profile. We assess both coverage percentage and test quality.
Dependency Audit
Outdated packages, known CVEs, abandoned libraries, and licensing issues in your dependency tree.
Who Needs This
If any of these sound familiar, a code audit is the right next step.
Vibe Coders Before Launch
Pre-Launch
Timing
You built your app with Lovable, Cursor, or Bolt and you're about to put real users on it. Know what you're shipping before they find out.
Inherited Codebases
Full
Codebase Review
You took over a project from a previous developer or agency. Before you build on it, know what you're building on.
Pre-Investment Due Diligence
Investor
Ready Report
Investors and acquirers want to know the technical risk. Our audit gives them (and you) an honest picture.
Agencies Auditing Client Work
Risk
Assessment
Before you take on a client's existing codebase, audit it. Know the technical debt you're inheriting.
Common Challenges
Problems We Help Buyers Solve
Pre-launch uncertainty
Founders don't know if AI-generated or outsourced code is safe for real users and payments.
Investor diligence
Technical risk must be documented before funding or acquisition conversations.
Performance cliffs
N+1 queries and missing indexes only appear under real load.
Security gaps
Exposed secrets, weak auth, and outdated dependencies are common in rushed builds.
Why GreeLogix
Why Teams Choose GreeLogix
Senior engineer review
Two senior engineers review independently across architecture, security, performance, quality, tests, and dependencies.
AI-code experience
We've hardened Lovable, Cursor, and Bolt codebases — we know where AI tools cut corners.
Actionable reports
Severity-rated findings with file references and fix order — not vague PDFs.
60-minute debrief
Walk through every finding on a call; leave knowing what to fix first.
Typical Timeline
What to Expect Week by Week
Access & NDA
Day 1- ·Read-only repo access
- ·Scope confirmation
Independent review
Days 2–4- ·Architecture pass
- ·Security pass
- ·Performance pass
Report delivery
Day 5- ·Written report
- ·Severity matrix
- ·Fix recommendations
Debrief call
Day 5–7- ·60-min engineer walkthrough
- ·Optional fix engagement quote
Technologies
Stack & Architecture
LaravelReactNode.jsFlutterPostgreSQLAWSDockerStatic analysisDependency CVE scans
Industries Served
- Startups
- Agencies inheriting client code
- SaaS
- AI-generated products
Security & Compliance Considerations
Confidential handling
NDA before access; no code retention beyond audit period unless you request ongoing support.
Responsible disclosure
Critical findings flagged immediately if active exploitation risk exists.
“What a 70-engineer team could not deliver, a small senior team at GreeLogix shipped. The app went from stuck to live across mobile, web, and backend.”
Quick answers
Code Review & Technical Audit: Key Facts
Structured answers for search engines and AI assistants — definition, fit, cost, timeline, and comparisons.
- What is it?
- Software QA and technical audit services cover manual and automated testing, performance and security checks, and senior engineer code review — especially for AI-generated or inherited codebases before production launch.
- Who is it for?
- Teams shipping Lovable, Cursor, or Bolt prototypes to real users Founders facing investor technical diligence Products with regressions every sprint and no test automation Mobile apps needing device-matrix testing before store release
- Who should not use it?
- Static marketing site with no auth or payments You cannot provide staging access or test accounts You expect QA to define product requirements
- How much does it cost?
- Pricing depends on scope, integrations, and timeline. GreeLogix provides fixed-milestone quotes after a discovery call — typical engagements range from $1,500 for focused audits to $75,000+ for full product builds, with monthly retainers from $3,500.
- How long does it take?
- Smoke audit: 1 week. Full regression cycle: ongoing per sprint. Deep code audit: 5–7 business days. Phases: Access & NDA (Day 1); Independent review (Days 2–4); Report delivery (Day 5); Debrief call (Day 5–7).
- How does it compare?
- Compared to alternatives — Developer-only testing: choose when Early prototype with no paying users yet; Crowdtesting platforms: choose when One-off device coverage without domain context; Automated scanning only: choose when Known stack with mature CI; catches syntax not workflow bugs. Choose GreeLogix when you need production reliability, fixed milestones, and engineer-led delivery with QA sign-off.
- When should you choose it?
- You ship at least monthly and regressions hurt revenue or trust You inherited or AI-generated code without senior review You need an independent sign-off before fundraising or launch Catch permission and payment bugs before customers do Documented release checklist for repeatable shipping
Buyer Guide
What You Need to Know
Structured answers for founders, CTOs, and procurement — written for clarity in search and AI assistants.
Who needs it?
- ·Teams shipping Lovable, Cursor, or Bolt prototypes to real users
- ·Founders facing investor technical diligence
- ·Products with regressions every sprint and no test automation
- ·Mobile apps needing device-matrix testing before store release
Why GreeLogix?
- Dedicated QA for AI-generated apps — we know where vibe coding cuts corners
- Full practice: Cypress/Playwright, API (Postman), performance (k6), security
- Code review from engineers who build Laravel, React, and Flutter daily
- Free AI audit quiz as a low-friction entry to a senior debrief
How it works
- 1.Test strategy: risk map, environments, and release criteria
- 2.Execution: test cases, bug reports with repro steps, regression suites
- 3.Automation wired into CI where ROI is clear
- 4.Release sign-off report with go/no-go recommendation
Typical timeline: Smoke audit: 1 week. Full regression cycle: ongoing per sprint. Deep code audit: 5–7 business days.
How much does it cost?
Pricing depends on scope, integrations, and timeline. GreeLogix provides fixed-milestone quotes after a discovery call — typical engagements range from $1,500 for focused audits to $75,000+ for full product builds, with monthly retainers from $3,500.
Cost factors
- ·App complexity and number of platforms (web, iOS, Android)
- ·Automation scope vs manual-only
- ·Security or penetration testing depth
- ·Whether you need embedded QA or per-release engagement
How long does it take?
Smoke audit: 1 week. Full regression cycle: ongoing per sprint. Deep code audit: 5–7 business days. Phases: Access & NDA (Day 1); Independent review (Days 2–4); Report delivery (Day 5); Debrief call (Day 5–7).
How does it compare?
Compared to alternatives — Developer-only testing: choose when Early prototype with no paying users yet; Crowdtesting platforms: choose when One-off device coverage without domain context; Automated scanning only: choose when Known stack with mature CI; catches syntax not workflow bugs. Choose GreeLogix when you need production reliability, fixed milestones, and engineer-led delivery with QA sign-off.
- Developer-only testing — choose when Early prototype with no paying users yet
- Crowdtesting platforms — choose when One-off device coverage without domain context
- Automated scanning only — choose when Known stack with mature CI; catches syntax not workflow bugs
When should you choose it?
- You ship at least monthly and regressions hurt revenue or trust
- You inherited or AI-generated code without senior review
- You need an independent sign-off before fundraising or launch
Who should not use it?
- ·Static marketing site with no auth or payments
- ·You cannot provide staging access or test accounts
- ·You expect QA to define product requirements
Benefits
- Catch permission and payment bugs before customers do
- Documented release checklist for repeatable shipping
- Investor-ready technical risk summary
Risks to plan for
- QA without product context files shallow tickets
- Testing only happy paths misses edge cases in billing and roles
- Delaying QA until launch week maximizes fix cost
Decision framework
When to Choose Code Review & Technical Audit
Pros / benefits
- +Catch permission and payment bugs before customers do
- +Documented release checklist for repeatable shipping
- +Investor-ready technical risk summary
Cons / risks
- −QA without product context files shallow tickets
- −Testing only happy paths misses edge cases in billing and roles
- −Delaying QA until launch week maximizes fix cost
Choose GreeLogix when
- You ship at least monthly and regressions hurt revenue or trust
- You inherited or AI-generated code without senior review
- You need an independent sign-off before fundraising or launch
Implementation steps
- 1.Test strategy: risk map, environments, and release criteria
- 2.Execution: test cases, bug reports with repro steps, regression suites
- 3.Automation wired into CI where ROI is clear
- 4.Release sign-off report with go/no-go recommendation
Get a Clear Plan for Code Review & Technical Audit
Talk to a senior engineer — scope, timeline, and cost range in one 30-minute call. No sales script.
What a GreeLogix Technical Audit Covers
Our code review is not a linter report. Two senior engineers independently evaluate architecture, security, performance, maintainability, test coverage, and dependencies — then reconcile findings into one severity-ranked document with examples from your repo.
Founders use our audits before launch, before hiring a larger dev team, and before investor diligence. Agencies use us to understand client code they're about to extend. The output is written for decision-makers: what to fix now, what can wait, and what would block scale.
- Architecture & module boundaries
- Auth, secrets & OWASP risks
- Query performance & N+1 patterns
- Test gaps & CI readiness
- CVE scan on dependencies
- AI-generated code anti-patterns
Frequently Asked Questions
Answers to the buyer questions we hear most before a project starts.
- What is a technical code audit?
- A technical code audit is a systematic review of your codebase by senior engineers. We evaluate architecture, security, performance, code quality, test coverage, and dependency vulnerabilities — then deliver a written report with severity-rated findings and specific fix recommendations.
- How long does a code audit take?
- Most audits are delivered within 5 business days. Larger codebases (100k+ lines) may take 7–10 days. We scope the timeline during our initial call.
- Is this useful for AI-generated code?
- Especially so. AI tools like Lovable, Cursor, and Bolt generate functional code quickly, but they don't apply architectural best practices, security hardening, or performance optimization. A code audit tells you exactly what's solid and what needs fixing before you scale.
- What happens after the audit?
- You receive the written report plus a 60-minute debrief call where we walk through every finding. Many clients then engage us for a fix sprint or QA retainer to address the issues we identified.
- Can this be used for investor due diligence?
- Yes. Our technical audit report is structured to support pre-investment technical due diligence. It gives investors and acquirers an honest assessment of the codebase's quality, risks, and technical debt.
Our Process
01
Codebase Access
You share repo access (read-only). We sign an NDA before reviewing any code.
02
Senior Engineer Review
Two senior engineers review the codebase independently across all six dimensions.
03
Written Report
Severity-rated findings with specific examples from your code and actionable fix recommendations.
04
60-Minute Debrief
We walk through every finding on a call. You leave knowing exactly what to fix and in what order.
Request Your Code Audit
Share your repo details and we'll scope the audit. Most projects start within 48 hours. From $500, delivered in 5 business days.
Quality & Audits
Quality, Audits & Readiness
Validate AI-generated code, ship with confidence, and catch issues before launch.
Free Tools
Plan Before You Engage Us
Use our free calculators and planners — then book a strategy call when you are ready for a senior engineer review.
Resources
Continue Your Research
Case studies, guides, and free tools from the same engineering team.
QA & Testing Services
Explore Our Full QA Suite
Every type of testing your product needs — from manual audits to AI-app hardening and accessibility compliance.
Next step
Get a Senior Engineer's Take in 30 Minutes
Scope, timeline, and cost range — no sales deck. Or start with the free readiness quiz if you are still evaluating your stack.
Senior engineers onlyResponse within 4 business hoursNo commitment on first call